Appwrite vs PocketBase
Comparing two backend as a service platforms on pricing, features, free tier, and trade-offs.
Quick summary
Appwrite — Open source backend platform for developers. Appwrite is an open-source end-to-end backend server that provides auth, databases, storage, functions, and messaging.
PocketBase — Open source backend in 1 file. PocketBase is an open-source Go backend, bundled as a single executable, with embedded SQLite, auth, realtime, and admin UI.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Appwrite | PocketBase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free |
| Starting price | $15/mo | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Auth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Database | MariaDB | SQLite |
| Realtime | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier | Yes | Unlimited (self-host) |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Edge Functions | Yes | No |
| Row Level Security | Yes | Yes |
Appwrite
Open source backend platform for developers
Pros
- Fully open source
- Self-hostable with Docker
- Multiple SDK languages
Cons
- Smaller community vs Supabase/Firebase
- Fewer third-party integrations
PocketBase
Open source backend in 1 file
Pros
- Zero-config single binary
- Fast and lightweight
- Great for small-to-medium apps
Cons
- SQLite limits horizontal scale
- Single maintainer
- No managed cloud offering
Which should you choose?
Choose Appwrite if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage. Choose PocketBase if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage.