PocketBase vs Supabase
Comparing two backend as a service platforms on pricing, features, free tier, and trade-offs.
Quick summary
PocketBase — Open source backend in 1 file. PocketBase is an open-source Go backend, bundled as a single executable, with embedded SQLite, auth, realtime, and admin UI.
Supabase — The open source Firebase alternative. Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service built on PostgreSQL. It provides authentication, realtime subscriptions, storage, edge functions, and a hosted database.
Feature comparison
| Feature | PocketBase | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $25/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Auth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Database | SQLite | PostgreSQL |
| Realtime | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier | Unlimited (self-host) | 500MB DB + 1GB storage |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Edge Functions | No | Yes |
| Row Level Security | Yes | Yes |
PocketBase
Open source backend in 1 file
Pros
- Zero-config single binary
- Fast and lightweight
- Great for small-to-medium apps
Cons
- SQLite limits horizontal scale
- Single maintainer
- No managed cloud offering
Supabase
The open source Firebase alternative
Pros
- Open source and self-hostable
- Standard PostgreSQL — no vendor lock-in
- Generous free tier
- Great DX with auto-generated APIs
Cons
- Cold starts on free tier
- Edge function ecosystem still maturing
Which should you choose?
Choose PocketBase if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage. Choose Supabase if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage.