Nhost vs PocketBase
Comparing two backend as a service platforms on pricing, features, free tier, and trade-offs.
Quick summary
Nhost — Open source Firebase alternative with GraphQL. Nhost is an open-source backend platform combining PostgreSQL, Hasura GraphQL, authentication, and storage.
PocketBase — Open source backend in 1 file. PocketBase is an open-source Go backend, bundled as a single executable, with embedded SQLite, auth, realtime, and admin UI.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Nhost | PocketBase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Free |
| Starting price | $25/mo | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Auth | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Database | PostgreSQL | SQLite |
| Realtime | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier | Yes | Unlimited (self-host) |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Edge Functions | Yes | No |
| Row Level Security | Yes | Yes |
Nhost
Open source Firebase alternative with GraphQL
Pros
- GraphQL-first via Hasura
- Postgres + open source
- Good developer experience
Cons
- Smaller community
- GraphQL learning curve
PocketBase
Open source backend in 1 file
Pros
- Zero-config single binary
- Fast and lightweight
- Great for small-to-medium apps
Cons
- SQLite limits horizontal scale
- Single maintainer
- No managed cloud offering
Which should you choose?
Choose Nhost if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage. Choose PocketBase if you value open source and want the option to self-host, and a free tier is important for your stage.